WG4's handling of DR-09-0248 - General: Removing the need for qualifiers on attributes in Strict

[Jirka Kosek]

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:

> The reason that WG4 in Copenhagen decided not to incorporate the change
> is the sheer amount of required changes.  You are now arguing that such 
> changes would be nice but not mandatory.  Since the change in reply to
> 08-0012 is likely to have similar instructions (i.e., interpret all examples 
> in Part 1 using different namespaces), you might have a point.
> 
> Usually, I am not willing to revisit decisions of WG4.  But if you and 
> Mohamed are willing to provide change text to be incorporated and some
> people support the idea, WG4 might be willing to revisit this decision. 

Hi Rex and Jesper,

do you already have Amd1 text for 08-0012 so I can model 09-0248 change
text on it?

Thanks,

				Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka at kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20090702/94ff3e77/attachment.pgp>