DR 09-0216: WML: Custom XML and Smart Tags

[Innovimax SARL]

Was also wondering why it is used "CAN" which is not RFC complient.

I would also go for a "MAY" ( "XML elements MAY be validated") and would
also add ("but MUST be valid with respect to the attachedSchema")

Mohamed



On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:46 AM, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <
eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp> wrote:

> >  which shall be specified using the attachedSchema element
>
> Is this a recommendation or a requirement?  In other words,
> is the attachedSchema element authoritative?
>
> Cheers,
> Makoto
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20090611/a37836a2/attachment.htm>