Action item from today's WG4 phone call

[Innovimax SARL]

That's fine for FR Comments

Mohamed

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com> wrote:
> Some NBs did not submit their comments in the required ISO comment form. In
> those cases, the project editor did his best to identify the individual
> comments in those submissions, and produced versions in the required ISO
> comment form.
>
> Part 1
>
> ·       CA used an IEC form, which appears to be equivalent to the ISO
> comment form.
>
> ·       FR and JP submitted their comments in narrative form.
>
> Part 2
>
> ·       CA used an IEC form, which appears to be equivalent to the ISO
> comment form.
>
> ·       FR submitted its comments in narrative form.
>
> Part 3
>
> ·       CA used an IEC form, which appears to be equivalent to the ISO
> comment form.
>
> ·       FR submitted its comments in narrative form.
>
> Part 4
>
> ·       CA used an IEC form, which appears to be equivalent to the ISO
> comment form.
>
> ·       CH, FR, JP, and MY submitted their comments in narrative form.
>
> Action: All WG4 members to check that the editor’s conversion of these
> comments was correct and complete.
>
> Rex
>
> ----------------
>
> Rex Jaeschke      www.ProgrammingClassroom.com  www.RexJaeschke.com   Skype:
> RexJaeschke
>
> 2051 Swans Neck Way, Reston, VA, 20191-4023, USA
>
> Phone: +1 703 860-0091



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €