Strict/Transitional - Discussion Document

[Caroline Arms]

Alex,

I think this is an excellent document.  

I found one typo, in last line on page 4.  I believe a "not" is missing.

Caroline

Caroline Arms
Library of Congress Contractor
Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/

** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the institution **
>>> "Alex Brown" <alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk> 10/29/09 6:15 AM >>>
Oh rats - wrong PDF.

Could've been embarrassing !

Please find the right one attached ...

- Alex.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Brown [mailto:alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk]
> Sent: 29 October 2009 10:04
> To: SC 34 WG4
> Cc: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
> Subject: Strict/Transitional - Discussion Document
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Please find attached a discussion document that a subgroup of us WG 4
> members have been working on over the last several days.
> 
> This is intended to set out the key considerations for our onward
> consideration of the Strict and Transitional forms of IS 29500, and is
not
> intended to arrive at any particular conclusions.
> 
> So - thoughts, comments, analysis, corrections and discussion please!
> 
> - Alex.
>