Another error in the Part 1 FPDAM1

Shawn Villaron shawnv at microsoft.com
Mon Jan 18 15:06:07 CET 2010


I don't believe the intention was to change these namespaces.  That is, anything OPC-related, I believe, was to be left as-is.

Am I missing something here, or did I misunderstand the intended change?

Thanks,

shawn

-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp] 
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 6:04 AM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Re: Another error in the Part 1 FPDAM1

> http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships
> in page 3955 of the original Part 1 is not replaced by a new namespace 
> name.

The same thing applies to http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships
in page 3964.

Cheers,
Makoto



More information about the sc34wg4 mailing list