Another error in the Part 1 FPDAM1

[MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)]

> I believe that we have agreed to change the relationship type names
> defined in Part 1 such as

While reviewing the FPDAM more carefully, it appears that

http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/relationships

is a namespace name defined in Part 2 but everything that matches

http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/relationships/*

is a relationship name.

So, we do not have to chagne http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships 
in pages 3955 or 3964.

Cheers,
Makoto