DR 09-0271 - Part 3 Normative References Missing

[Shawn Villaron]

I think we'd be safe to remove the first reference ( clause 2 ) as it just talked about unspecified behaviors.  So no real loss there.

I have reservations about removing the second reference ( clause 12 ).  Let me think about this a bit and see if we can come to a resolution on Thursday.

-----Original Message-----
From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:02 AM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Re: DR 09-0271 - Part 3 Normative References Missing

> I also wonder if we need to mention Part 1 at all?  It's not mentioned 
> normatively, and Part 3 itself is pretty generic ( even the examples 
> don't use Part 1 constructs ) .

How about deleting

"Any behavior that is not explicitly specified by this Part of ISO/IEC
29500 is implicitly unspecified (Part 1, §4)." in Clause 2

and

"[Note: the ext and extLst elements defined in Part 1 are examples of such extension elements. end note]" from Clause 12

?


Cheers,
Makoto <EB2M-MRT at asahi-net.or.jp>