RE: DR 10-0038 — OPC: Unused term “simple ordering”

[Chris Rae]

There are others in this same type of bucket, which makes me think I've gotten the wrong end of the stick. I'll wait for Alex to reply before I make similar claims about the others.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com] 
Sent: 18 November 2010 16:27
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org; alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk
Subject: DR 10-0038 — OPC: Unused term “simple ordering”

http://cid-c8ba0861dc5e4adc.office.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2010/DR-10-0038.docx

This DR covers the definition of the term "simple ordering", which it says is not used anywhere. I don't think this is quite right - "simple ordering" appears to be used (in the context in which it's defined) around nine times in Part 2. It's sister term, "interleaved ordering", is also used a similar number of times.

Alex, am I getting the wrong end of the stick?

Chris