DR 10-0004 Reference missing from Scope

Rex Jaeschke rex at RexJaeschke.com
Thu Oct 14 16:39:24 CEST 2010

Hi Caroline, I just saw your mail after we had adopted the wording exactly
as I proposed. We did debate another phrase, but decided to leave that one
alone. We've moved this to Last Call and I will send CH a copy as a


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arms, Caroline [mailto:caar at loc.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:03 AM
> To: Rex Jaeschke; SC 34 WG4
> Subject: RE: DR 10-0004 Reference missing from Scope
> The wording "Some of the differences" seems likely to raise more
> questions for a reader.
> I might replace
> "Some of the differences are reflected in schema changes, as shown in"
>    by
> "Differences in the schemas are shown in"
>    Caroline
> Caroline Arms
> Library of Congress Contractor
> Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
> http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/
> ** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the
> institution **
> ________________________________________
> From: Rex Jaeschke [rex at RexJaeschke.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:07 PM
> To: SC 34 WG4
> Subject: DR 10-0004  Reference missing from Scope
> At the Tokyo Meeting 2010-09-06/08:
> There was agreement to add text along the lines of that proposed.
> However, there were doubts as to whether such a thing can/should go in
> the Scope. Perhaps the Foreword is a better location. Also, as each
> Part has its own Scope, each Part affected by this (Parts 1, 2, and 4,
> apparently) should have its own note.
> Action: Rex will investigate further and draft a resolution for review
> by the submitter (CH).
> I have added proposed wording to the DR. See 10-0004<http://cid-
> c8ba0861dc5e4adc.office.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2010/DR-
> 10-0004.docx>. Let's discuss this on the next telcon, and once we agree
> on the words, I will send them along to the folks in CH.
> Rex

More information about the sc34wg4 mailing list