Revised document conformance text

[Alex Brown]

Should Part 1 have *any* mentions of "ML transitional" (given that Part 1 does not reference Part 4)?

- Alex.

-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp] 
Sent: 02 August 2011 11:52
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: Revised document conformance text

Chris,

I think that the three subclasses were introduced since some application programs can handle only one of WML, PML, and SML.

One could argue that we should either go further (such as "WML
strict-horizontal-writing-only-black-and-white-only") or stop at "Strict".  How do people feel?

If we really drop the subclasses, we have to be thorough.  Part 4 has 14 occurrences of "ML Transitional" and 3 occurrences of "ML strict", while Part 1 has 17 occurrences of "ML strict" and 6 occurrences of "ML transitional"


Cheers,
Makoto

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________