RE: DR 10-0042 - OPC: The semantics of “ignore”

[John Haug]

New proposal revisions based on this morning’s discussion.

From: John Haug [mailto:johnhaug at exchange.microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 8:12 PM
To: 'e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org'
Subject: DR 10-0042 - OPC: The semantics of “ignore”

https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2010/DR-10-0042.docx?cid=c8ba0861dc5e4adc&sc=documents

Hi all –
The core of this DR is that “Ignore” is used in the tables in Part 2, Annex C but it is not defined even though the other table values are.  I’ve attached a change that add a definition for Ignore, as well as the standard numbered mandatory conformance requirement.  There was some discussion about this yesterday, so perhaps this is the basis for a bit more.

John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20110928/2a31b086/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DR 10-0042 changes 2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 27414 bytes
Desc: DR 10-0042 changes 2.docx
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20110928/2a31b086/attachment-0001.bin>