PLEASE PROOF: N 0271, 29500-3 (MCE) Revision, WD0.93

[MURATA Makoto]

While implementing Step 2, I started to wonder whether or not
the following bullet in Step 3 (case 3) should be moved to Step 2.

  ·         If some child element of this AlternateContent element is neither
            a Choice nor Fallback element and is not marked as ignored,
            signal a mismatch.

One could argue that this should be in Step 3, since it uses the result of
Step 1.  One could also argue that this should be in Step 2, since
such mismatch under ignored elements will be detected.  (At present,
it will not be detected.)  One could even argue that such mismatch should
not be detected.

Regards,
Makoto




2013/9/18 Jim Thatcher <Jim.Thatcher at microsoft.com>:
> I reviewed Murata-san's changes and I agree that the two steps can be combined into one. I've suggested a handful of editorial changes in the attached draft. Those suggestions are made using change tracking with "Jim" as the identified user.
>
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 8:53 PM
> To: SC 34 WG4
> Subject: Re: PLEASE PROOF: N 0271, 29500-3 (MCE) Revision, WD0.93
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> In Delft, we agreed that elements/attributes not marked as ignorable do not have to be checked whether or not they belong to understood namespaces.  Based on this agreement, we simplified Step 4.  But we can go even further by merging Step 3 and Step 4.  Such merge allows @MustUnderstand be processed at a single step rather than two steps.
>
> Here is a proposed rewrite.  It also addresses another concern:
> top-down recursiveness is clearer.
>
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
> 2013/9/13 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:
>> Please review this draft and post any comments to this email list.
>>
>> On the next teleconference (2013-10-15), we'll review all feedback and
>> then push out WD1.0 for a public review. So please send along your
>> concerns now rather than through the much more formal reporting
>> required by the CD ballot, which will come later.
>>
>> Rex
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto