PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10

[MURATA Makoto]

#23

(§17.18.102) is missing in the consolidated text.

#41

"ancestorstructured" in the first para of the consolidated text should
be "ancestor structured".

It remains to check  #42 to #145.

Regards,
Makoto

2015-07-15 19:39 GMT+09:00 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>:

> It appears that at least a table and four figures in the agreed DR 12-0025
> log
> has not been correctly incorporated in the DCOR and thus the consolidated
> text.    Sine these errors exist in the DCOR, I am afraid that we have to
> submit another DR and wait for the next revision.
>
> The table in #49 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.
> The figure in #50 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.
> The figure in #245 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.
> The figure in #246 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.
> The figure in #252 of the COR differs from that in the DR Log.
>
> So far, I have only compared the COR and the consolidated text.  But
> this example indicates that we should have more carefully compared
> the DR log and the COR.
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
> 2015-07-13 3:55 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:
>
>> #216
>>
>>
>>
>> Agreed; that sentence was in the COR but not in the consolidated draft.
>> I’ll add it.
>>
>>
>>
>> #222
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree, I got it wrong in the XSD, but right in the RelaxNG. I’ll fix
>> that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *MURATA
>> Makoto
>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 12, 2015 6:36 AM
>>
>> *To:* SC 34 WG4
>> *Subject:* Re: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and
>> 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by
>> 2015-07-10
>>
>>
>>
>> #216
>>
>>
>> A sentence should be added to the first para.
>>
>>
>>
>>  This value is used as one piece of information to guide selection of a
>> similar alternate font if the
>>
>> desired font is unavailable.
>>
>>
>>
>> #222
>>
>>
>>
>> The default value is not "nlCheck" but "off"
>>
>>
>>
>> #222 is my last so far.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Makoto
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-07-11 8:21 GMT+09:00 John Haug <johnhaug at exchange.microsoft.com>:
>>
>> Rex, if you don’t mind ignoring your request for comments by tomorrow, I
>> can look at some of these next week.
>>
>>
>>
>> Which items did you review, Murata-san?  You said you started with #146
>> (18.17.7.242, I believe) and the highest number you commented on is #198.
>>
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 9, 2015 12:33 PM
>> *To:* 'SC 34 WG4'
>> *Subject:* RE: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and
>> 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by
>> 2015-07-10
>>
>>
>>
>> See my responses in-line. I disagree with one and don’t understand one
>> other.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com <eb2mmrt at gmail.com>] *On
>> Behalf Of *MURATA Makoto
>> *Sent:* Friday, July 3, 2015 9:27 AM
>> *To:* SC 34 WG4
>> *Subject:* Re: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and
>> 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by
>> 2015-07-10
>>
>>
>>
>> #198
>>
>>
>>
>> This change was correctly incorporated, but the indentation in the
>>
>> consolidated Part 1 is too much.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex> Agreed; will fix.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Makoto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-07-03 17:25 GMT+09:00 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>:
>>
>> Rex,
>>
>>
>>
>> I began with #146 of Part1.  I will send more.
>>
>>
>>
>> #152
>>
>>
>>
>> The second bullet in #152 in the COR to Part 1 lacks a verb "is".
>>
>> Although this does not exist in the COR, I think that this
>>
>> editorial error can be fixed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex> Agreed; will fix.
>>
>>
>>
>> #155
>>
>>
>>
>> The COR is correct, but the consolidated text does not
>>
>> incorporate this change.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex> Disagree; I see the fix applied in both the DOCX and PDF versions.
>>
>>
>>
>> #169
>>
>>
>>
>> This change was correctly incorporated, but the layout
>>
>> is broken. See 18.17.7.342 in Part 1.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex> Agreed; the trailing newline should be restored. Will fix.
>>
>>
>>
>> #174-176
>>
>>
>>
>> "unit face value" should be replaced by "units face value".
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex> Agreed; will fix.
>>
>>
>>
>> #177
>>
>>
>>
>> This change was correctly incorporated, but the layout
>>
>> is broken. See 18.17.7.356 in Part 1.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex> Agreed; the trailing newline should be restored. Will fix.
>>
>>
>>
>> #187
>>
>>
>>
>> Is *notes*Master actually a notes master?  This is for
>>
>> both the DCOR text and the consolidated text.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex> I don’t understand your question. Are your suggesting the DR
>> resolution in this regard is incorrect?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Makoto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-06-04 0:58 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:
>>
>> Some months ago, balloting ended on CORs for Parts 1 and 4 of 29500. Both
>> ballots passed.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have applied the edits in each COR to the corresponding standard from
>> 2012 to create a 2015 edition. As this new edition contains no new material
>> beyond what was adopted in the ballots, no further balloting is necessary;
>> this is an editorial task.
>>
>>
>>
>> However, before I submit the final versions to ISO for publication, I’m
>> giving WG4 (and Ecma TC45) members a chance to review the final drafts to
>> make sure I applied all the edits correctly. In the case of Part 1, there
>> are some 250 sets of edits. I don’t expect members to check all of them,
>> but if each member randomly chose 10 of them and checked those, we’ll
>> likely get good coverage.
>>
>>
>>
>> The changes are tracked, and both DOCX and PDF versions are included for
>> each Part. Don’t be concerned if you see some bright blue edits, as they
>> will be “fixed” when I finally adopt the tracked changes.
>>
>>
>>
>> Part 4 contains some manual pointers into Part 1, but these have not yet
>> been updated. I will do that once Part 1’s tracked changes have been
>> adopted, and that Part is frozen.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have posted to Livelink the 49-MB and 13-MB zip files as documents
>> 2015-0309 and 2015-0310, respectively. Only registered members can access
>> these.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rex Jaeschke, 29500 Project Editor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>>
>> Makoto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>>
>> Makoto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>>
>> Makoto
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20150716/11c7eb4b/attachment-0001.html>