Differences between transitional schemas in Annex A and schema files

[MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)]

Dear colleagues,

I extracted schemas in ISO-IECJTC1-SC34-WG4_N0310 and compared 
them against transitional schemas in the schema repository at Assembla.com.
Again, I find some errors.

1. dml-chart.xsd in Annex A

1) Delete

  <xsd:restriction base="xsd:unsignedShort">
  <xsd:minInclusive value="5"/>
  <xsd:maxInclusive value="500"/>
  </xsd:restriction>

after

  <xsd:simpleType name="ST_HPercent">

2) After

  <xsd:simpleType name="ST_HoleSizeUByte">
  <xsd:restriction base="xsd:unsignedByte">

replace

  <xsd:minInclusive value="10"/>

by

  <xsd:minInclusive value="1"/>

Also correct the itemized list in 18.1.3.10 ST_HoleSizeUByte (Hole
Size UnsignedByte).

Note: COR1 Replaced "10" by "1" in the original type ST_HoleSize.
Then, AMD1 reconstructed ST_HoleSize as the union of two types:
ST_HoleSizeUByte for mimicking the original def and ST_HoleSizePercent
for strings with the trailing "%".  Probably, AMD1 mistakenly did not
use "1" for ST_HoleSizeUByte.

2. wml.xsd in Annex A, Part 4

1) Replace

  <xsd:group ref="EG_RPrBase" minOccurs="0"/>

by

  <xsd:group ref="EG_RPrBase" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>

2) Insert

  <xsd:element name="name" type="CT_DocPartName" minOccurs="1"/>

after

  <xsd:complexType name="CT_DocPartPr">
  <xsd:all>


Cheers,
Makoto