ECMA-376 : bug? and concern

[Francis Cave]

Rex

 

I can only see DR 15-0022 – ST: No subclause for ST_OnOff1, which was
resolved by introducing a new subclause in Part 4. The DR was closed in
COR4.

 

I’ve done a search for ‘default=”off”’ in the latest edition and there are
three occurrences in Appendix A.1:

 

*	Page 3816, line 598 and line 601
*	Page 3818, line 671

 

These are certainly defects, because s:ST_OnOff is of type xs:boolean, and
the only valid values are ‘true’, ‘false’, ‘1’ and ‘0’.

 

I’ve only looked at the Appendix text, not the schemas.

 

Enjoy your vacation!

 

Francis

 

 

 

From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com] 
Sent: 15 March 2017 12:53
To: TC45 <e-TC45 at ecma-international.org>; SC 34 WG4
<e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org>
Subject: FW: ECMA-376 : bug? and concern

 

Hi all, I’m on vacation through the end of next week, but just received this
and thought I’d circulate it to a few people.

 

The mention of a problem with ST_OnOff reminded me of a DR we worked on in
the past year or so (don’t recall which), which we might have closed AFTER
the latest edition was frozen.

 

Rex

 

 

From: Patrick Charollais [mailto:patrick at ecma-international.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 5:02 AM
To: Jaeschke, R. <rex at RexJaeschke.com <mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com> >
Cc: Walch Isabelle <isabelle at ecma-international.org
<mailto:isabelle at ecma-international.org> >; p1 at originsystems.co.za
<mailto:p1 at originsystems.co.za> 
Subject: RE: ECMA-376 : bug? and concern

 

Good day Rex,

 

Please find forwarded an information request from Richard regarding ECMA-376
5th edition Part 1. Could you please check his concerns ?

 

Thanks in advance and all the best from a sunny Geneva.

 

Patrick

 

With best regards.

Ecma International Secretariat.

 

 

Patrick Charollais

Rue du Rhône 114

CH-1204 Geneva

T/F: +41 22 849 6000/01 

 

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 

 

From: Walch Isabelle 
Sent: mercredi 15 mars 2017 09:24
To: Patrick Charollais <patrick at ecma-international.org
<mailto:patrick at ecma-international.org> >
Subject: FW: ECMA-376 : bug? and concern

 

 

 

From: Richard [mailto:p1 at originsystems.co.za] 
Sent: mercredi 15 mars 2017 09:20
To: Walch Isabelle <isabelle at ecma-international.org
<mailto:isabelle at ecma-international.org> >
Subject: ECMA-376 : bug? and concern

 

Hi,

 

Thank you for your time today. 

 

As explained I am interested in the following 2 things:

 

Bug?

The ECMA 5th edition Part 1 strict schema does not validate in Altova XMLspy
2017, as shown here:


I believe this is due to ST_OnOff being of type xsd:boolean as follows: 
 

combined with a number of schema attributes of the type ST_OnOff having a
default value of “off” - which does not comply with xsd:boolean eg.


 

Concern

Because of the above issue I have not tested against the strict ECMA schema,
but Office 365 Word documents do not appear to comply to the 5th edition
transitional schema. For example, validating document.xml of the attached
Office 365 Word document fails validation against wml.xsd as shown here.  Is
this expected?






 

Thanks so much for the help!

 

Richard

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20170316/5b2b1e7a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 861 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20170316/5b2b1e7a/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 29993 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20170316/5b2b1e7a/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 8307 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20170316/5b2b1e7a/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image010.png
Type: image/png
Size: 720 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20170316/5b2b1e7a/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image012.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5086 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20170316/5b2b1e7a/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image014.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 111216 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20170316/5b2b1e7a/attachment-0007.jpg>