I was also wondering why we have such limitation.<br><br>Following our current rules it would go to a Amendment since it restrict the space of allowed documents<br><br>Mohamed<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:48 AM, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp">eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">> In shared-simpleTypes.xsd:<br>
><br>
> <xsd:simpleType name="ST_XmlName"><br>
> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:NCName"><br>
> <xsd:minLength value="1"/><br>
> <xsd:maxLength value="255"/><br>
> </xsd:restriction><br>
> </xsd:simpleType><br>
<br>
</div>Do we really need the maxLength facets? After all, Part 3 already<br>
allows foreign elements without imposing any restrictions on<br>
the length of local names.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<font color="#888888">Makoto<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Innovimax SARL<br>Consulting, Training & XML Development<br>9, impasse des Orteaux<br>75020 Paris<br>Tel : +33 9 52 475787<br>Fax : +33 1 4356 1746<br><a href="http://www.innovimax.fr">http://www.innovimax.fr</a><br>
RCS Paris 488.018.631<br>SARL au capital de 10.000 €<br>