Was also wondering why it is used "CAN" which is not RFC complient.<br><br>I would also go for a "MAY" ( "XML elements MAY be validated") and would also add ("but MUST be valid with respect to the attachedSchema")<br>
<br>Mohamed <br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:46 AM, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp">eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">> which shall be specified using the attachedSchema element<br>
<br>
</div>Is this a recommendation or a requirement? In other words,<br>
is the attachedSchema element authoritative?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<font color="#888888">Makoto<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Innovimax SARL<br>Consulting, Training & XML Development<br>9, impasse des Orteaux<br>75020 Paris<br>Tel : +33 9 52 475787<br>Fax : +33 1 4356 1746<br><a href="http://www.innovimax.fr">http://www.innovimax.fr</a><br>
RCS Paris 488.018.631<br>SARL au capital de 10.000 €<br>