<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><title>Question regarding DR 09-0216</title><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
..MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=Section1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I have no objections to the proposed text.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex@RexJaeschke.com] <br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, June 29, 2009 12:57 PM<br><b>To:</b> SC 34 WG4<br><b>Subject:</b> Question regarding DR 09-0216<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p><a name=""><span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:#365F91'>I show email traffic</span></a> <span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:#365F91'>(see below) based</span> <span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:#365F91'>on</span> <span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:#365F91'>my proposed response, but no record of agreement on</span> <span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:#365F91'>the final words after that. Did I miss something, or do we still need final words?</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:#365F91'>Rex</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-size:24.0pt;font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:#365F91'>1. </span> </b><b><span style='font-size:24.0pt;font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:#365F91'>DR 09-0216 — WML: Custom XML and Smart Tags</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Status:</span></b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> Closed; will be incorporated in COR1</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Subject:</span></b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> WML: Custom XML and Smart Tags</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Qualifier:</span></b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> Request for clarification</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Submitter:</span></b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> Mr. Francis Cave (BSI)</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Contact Information:</span></b> <a href="mailto:francis@franciscave.com"><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>francis@franciscave.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Submitter’s Defect Number:</span></b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> 08-00131</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Supporting Document(s):</span></b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> none</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Date Circulated by Secretariat:</span></b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> 2009-05-22</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Deadline for Response from Editor:</span></b> <span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>2009-07-22</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>IS 29500 Reference(s):</span></b> <span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Part 1: §17.5.1, “Custom XML and Smart Tags”, p. 529</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Related DR(s):</span></b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> none</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Nature of the Defect:</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>The second para on p. 529 following the bullets has: "The distinction between custom XML markup and smart tags is that custom XML markup is based on a specified schema."</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>It is not clear how "a specified schema" is specified in this context. Can there only be one specified schema per document?</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Solution Proposed by the Submitter:</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Point to normative text describing how one or more schemas are specified, or - if this does not exist - provide new text.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Schema Change(s) Needed:</span> </b><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Editor’s Response:</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>The exact changes are as follows:</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Part 1: §17.5, “Custom XML and Smart Tags”, p. 529</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>The distinction between custom XML markup and smart tags is that custom XML markup is based on a</span><s> </s><s><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:red'>specified</span></s><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> schema<u><span style='color:blue'>, which shall be specified using the</span></u></span> <span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:blue'>attachedSchema</span><u><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:blue'> element (§17.15.1.5)</span></u><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>. As a result, the custom XML elements can be validated against the schema. Also, as shown below, custom XML markup can be used at the block-level as well as on the inline (run) level.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>2009-06-11 Makoto Murata:</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>> which shall be specified using the</span> <span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:blue'>attachedSchema</span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> element</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Is this a recommendation or a requirement? In other words, is the</span> <span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:blue'>attachedSchema</span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> element authoritative?</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>2009-06-11 Mohamed Zergaoui:</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>I was also wondering why it is used "CAN" which is not RFC compliant.<br><br>I would also go for a "MAY" ("XML elements MAY be validated") and would also add ("but MUST be valid with respect to the</span> <span style='font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:blue'>attachedSchema</span><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>").</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>