<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 08.00.0681.000">
<TITLE>Issues for the next 2 SC 34/WG4 calls, beyond what Murata-san had listed in his revised agenda</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P DIR=LTR><FONT FACE="Calibri">1. </FONT><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">DR 09-0216 was supposedly closed. However, after I posted my plann</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">ed response, there was a lot of email traffic about this DR. As we have not met since then, we have not made a final decision on the resolution.</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri"></FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">T</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">he</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"></FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">Draft</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">CORs and</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> AMDs do NOT include any text for this DR.</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">2. </FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">On July 6, Rick J</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">elliffe</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> wrote,</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">“…</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> t</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">he draft Amendment seems to use only the old URIs for relationships.</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"></FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">For example, change 98 (p21/ PDF p32) s9.11.1 specifies extra linking relationships, but these are all in terms of old relationship identifiers.</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"></FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">For strict, these certain should use the new relationship URIs.</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">”</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> What specific changes do I need to make to fix this?</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
<UL DIR=LTR><UL DIR=LTR>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
</UL></UL>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">3. </FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">DR 09-0157. We had agreed to close this (and the proposed solution is in the draft</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> docs); however, in subsequent mail I see a request to re-open this topic, thereby removing it from the first COR/AMD set.</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> We need to dec</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">i</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">de on this.</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
<UL DIR=LTR><UL DIR=LTR>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
</UL></UL>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">Note that while I posted the DCORs and FPDAMs to the e</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">m</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">ail list,</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">they are</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"></FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"> <FONT FACE="Calibri">also available as WG4 document</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">s</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri"> N 0059 through 0064.</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Calibri">Rex</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>