<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#6E747A;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Hi Shawn<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Obviously these would be breaking changes for consumers, given the way we have defined Strict (i.e. everything that is currently in Part 1), but not for producers. We might wish to consider giving some guidance to producer implementers in such cases. But let’s see what the Word guys have to say…<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Francis<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Shawn Villaron [mailto:shawnv@microsoft.com] <br><b>Sent:</b> 21 February 2012 15:09<br><b>To:</b> francis@franciscave.com; e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org<br><b>Subject:</b> RE: What is or is not a legacy feature?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#6E747A'>Interesting. Let me ask the Word guys to get back to you on this.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#6E747A'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#6E747A'>I do feel compelled to point out that if we were to remove one of the constructs from Strict, it’s a breaking change, which we try to avoid. But I’m sure everyone knows that …<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#6E747A'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#6E747A'>I’ll try to get you a response by the end of the week.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#6E747A'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Francis Cave [mailto:francis@franciscave.com] <br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 21, 2012 7:08 AM<br><b>To:</b> e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org<br><b>Subject:</b> RE: What is or is not a legacy feature?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>While I think of it, the same issue arises with two run properties in WordprocessingML: w:highlight and w:shd. Although section 17.3.2.15 does document the interaction between these two elements, as far as I can see anything that be expressed using w:highlight (which only controls background colour, and only uses colour names) can be expressed using w:shd. This suggests that any new producer implementation of WML Strict would probably not implement both ways, and would probably choose to implement w:shd as the more powerful of the two. This in turn suggests that w:highlight could be considered to be a legacy feature.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Francis<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Francis Cave <a href="mailto:[mailto:francis@franciscave.com]">[mailto:francis@franciscave.com]</a> <br><b>Sent:</b> 21 February 2012 14:58<br><b>To:</b> 'e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org'<br><b>Subject:</b> What is or is not a legacy feature?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I have recently needed to review the way that form controls can be represented in OOXML. It seems that there are two approaches, and both of these are documented in Part 1. The first approach is to use fields as documented in section 17.16. The second approach is to use structured document tags as documented in section 17.5.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There seems to be a fair amount of overlap in functionality between these two approaches, and this has caused me to wonder whether one of these (probably the use of fields) should be considered a “legacy” approach and moved to Part 4.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There appears to be some support for doing just that in an unlikely place: in the Microsoft Word 2007 / 2010 user interface. The tools for inserting form fields into a document are grouped together in a box labelled “Legacy Forms”.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’d be interested to hear expert opinions on this.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cheers,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Francis<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html>