<div dir="ltr"><div>Please look at the page "State transitions of the XAdES profiles" in</div><div>Lecture_on_XAdES_20140923.pdf in WG4 N 289 (in 2014). It was used in</div><div>Kyoto.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=16821707&objAction=Open">http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=16821707&objAction=Open</a></div><div><br></div><div>It clearly shows that XAdES-X-L (and XAdES-A) can be created from</div><div>XAdES-T. It is not required to create XAdES-C before creating</div><div>XAdES-X-L. In other words, XAdES-X-L signatures WITHOUT REFERENCES TO</div><div>VALIDATION DATA are perfectly legitimate XAdES signatures. However,</div><div>JNSA experts believe that MS Office reports such signatures as errors.</div><div>If the upcoming revision explicitly allows the use of the current</div><div>version of XAdES, it will disallow this behaviour thus making MS</div><div>Office non-conformant.</div><div><br></div><div>I understand why this misinterpretation happened. The existing XAdES</div><div>specifications are extremely unclear about the relationship of</div><div>conformance levels. However, those who are involved in XAdES</div><div>implementations (and interoperability testing) agree that XAdES-X-L</div><div>signatures without references to validation data are perfectly</div><div>legitimate.</div><div><br></div><div>You wrote: "I believe Microsoft Office supports all except -A."</div><div>What does Microsoft Office do when it receives XAdES-A? Does </div><div>it report an error?</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Makoto</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-06-06 5:39 GMT+09:00 John Haug <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com" target="_blank">johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">I had to dig back through old mail with the security folks who worked on this years ago. If this is related to the question about “validation data” and MS-OFFCRYPTO
seemingly requiring –C and disallowing –T, I’m told that’s not the intent. OPC should allow whatever XAdES levels it defines; applications can choose whether to support various levels based on their needs and industry adoption. I believe Microsoft Office
supports all except -A.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">John<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> <a href="mailto:eb2mmrt@gmail.com" target="_blank">eb2mmrt@gmail.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:eb2mmrt@gmail.com" target="_blank">eb2mmrt@gmail.com</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>MURATA Makoto<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, May 30, 2015 1:48 AM<span class=""><br>
<b>To:</b> John Haug<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org" target="_blank">e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Japanese position on the introduction of XAdES to OPC.<u></u><u></u></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">2015-05-29 3:21 GMT+09:00 John Haug <<a href="mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com" target="_blank">johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com</a>>:<u></u><u></u></p><div><div class="h5">
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">>
</span>Then, we will have two sets of conventions: Microsoft XAdES and the revised OPC. They are unlikely to be identical.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">I think this is the crux of what we need to figure out in detail. My impression is that XAdES hasn’t
changed terribly in its markup details, which would allow OPC to make restricting statements that would apply equally to current and upcoming XAdES. I may be wrong. Though if the differences are minor, we may simply note something like: for TS 101 903: foo,
and for EN 319 132: bar. We have a proposed set of requirements based on TS 101 903 in a draft we looked at in Bellevue, very similar to both MS-OFFCRYPTO and ODF 1.2, which we could evaluate against the latest draft of EN 319 132 to get a better idea of
this.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The conventions on the use of the current XAdES, if standardized <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">as part of the OPC revision, would allow XAdES-A as well as -L/-X-L without <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-C. (This is the right thing to do.) But how does Microsoft Office as of now<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> handle them?<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">JNSA experts believe that Microsoft Office cannot handle -L/-X-L without -C.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In other words, standardizing the conventions on the use of the <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">current XAdES may make Microsoft Office non-conformant.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regards,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Makoto<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><br>Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake<br><br>Makoto</div>
</div>