<div dir="ltr"><div>I think that we should mention <a style="text-align:left;color:rgb(120,136,220);text-transform:none;text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;word-spacing:0px;white-space:normal;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" href="http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2026/index.htm">U+2026</a> (Ellipsis). This is a very important use </div><div>case for Japanese users of the hint attribute. </div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipsis">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipsis</a></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Makoto</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-10-01 9:32 GMT+09:00 John Haug <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com" target="_blank">johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" vlink="#954F72" link="#0563C1">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">I edited the doc as suggested, though rather than saying (only) for characters which are not explicitly stored… I made it less specific. I believe someone said there are some printable characters that could
map to different font slots. Attached. How does that work?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">John<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;border-color:rgb(225,225,225) currentColor currentColor;padding:3pt 0in 0in"><span>
<p>-----Original Message-----<br>
From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:<a href="mailto:mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp" target="_blank">mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</a>] <br>
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:33 AM<br>
To: Arms, Caroline <<a href="mailto:caar@loc.gov" target="_blank">caar@loc.gov</a>><br>
Cc: John Haug <<a href="mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com" target="_blank">johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com</a>>; SC 34 WG4 <<a href="mailto:e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org" target="_blank">e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [sc34wg4] RE: COR3 issue: ST_Hint<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>I have no problem with the proposed improvement of the text.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>Regards,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>mpsuzuki<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u></u> <u></u></b></p>
</span><div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"><b>
<hr width="100%" size="2" align="center">
</b></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Arms, Caroline [mailto:<a href="mailto:caar@loc.gov" target="_blank">caar@loc.gov</a>] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:20 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> John Haug <<a href="mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com" target="_blank">johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com</a>>; SC 34 WG4 <<a href="mailto:e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org" target="_blank">e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org</a>>; suzuki toshiya <<a href="mailto:mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp" target="_blank">mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</a>><div><div class="h5"><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: COR3 issue: ST_Hint<u></u><u></u></div></div><p></p>
</p></div>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">John,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">From a grammatical viewpoint, I certainly don’t like “multiple of the”. What about “more than one of the”?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">I found the paragraph beginning ”There are” rather hard to grasp. I really needed to read the Note to understand it. The dogmatic “There are” seemed odd. And “</span>arbitrate that conflict” and “determine
how ambiguities in this run shall be handled” seem to be saying the same thing.<span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">Would there be any problem with:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">For characters which are not explicitly stored in the document, and which can be mapped into more than one of the font slot categories described in the parent element, this attribute shall be used to determine
how ambiguities in this run shall be handled.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"> Just a thought.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"> Caroline<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">Caroline Arms<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">Library of Congress Contractor<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
<a href="http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/" target="_blank">http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the institution **<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;border-color:rgb(181,196,223) currentColor currentColor;padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;font-size:10pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;font-size:10pt"> John Haug [<a href="mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com" target="_blank">mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:44 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> SC 34 WG4; suzuki toshiya<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: COR3 issue: ST_Hint<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Keeping this in the existing e-mail thread. I've attached the final text we arrived at during the face-to-face meeting in Beijing. In short, I modified the descriptive text to make it less proscriptive and more indicative that the values
of the attributes are an indicator that only has meaning when taken within the context of the parent element containing the attribute using this simple type.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">John<span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="15020d0e22c0545c__MailEndCompose"></a><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;border-color:rgb(225,225,225) currentColor currentColor;padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> John Haug [<a href="mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com" target="_blank">mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 18, 2015 3:28 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> SC 34 WG4 <<a href="mailto:e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org" target="_blank">e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org</a>>; suzuki toshiya <<a href="mailto:mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp" target="_blank">mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: COR3 issue: ST_Hint<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">Suzuki-san offered these comments on DR 09-0040 along with others in another e-mail:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p>DR 09-0040<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>----------<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>The "hint" attribute can take "cs" (complex script) for font slot selection?<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>The reason why "cs" was to be removed is following; By default, the font slot (from ansi/hansi/ea/cs) is selected by the codepoint of the character to be rendered.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>Also it is forcibly changed by w:cs or w:rtl elements.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>The default slot selection by the codepoint is sometimes not unique but configurable (e.g. the ellipsis is rendered by for ascii slot by default, but it could be changed to ea slot, by setting hint to ea). For such configurable cases,
the codepoint-to-slot table have special descriptions like "use X slot, but if hint is set to Y, Y slot is used".<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>We should be careful that the hint does not change everything, but changes configurable parts.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>At present, the codepoint-to-slot table has no character that cs slot is used by default, or, cs slot could be used by setting hint appropriately. If the table is correct, I'm suspicious if setting hint to cs has any effect.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>I think this was background why cs would be removed from the possible values of hint.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>There would be a few rationales to permit "cs" value in hint;<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>a) the table was incorrect; some codepoints could be configured to use cs font slot, by setting hint to cs.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>b) setting hint to cs makes everything rendered by cs font slot, as w:cs and w:rtl.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>c) setting hint to cs does nothing, but the values should be permitted because existing implementation could write it (dealing them as "invalid" is problematic).<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>I think any of above 3 rationales would be reasonable to permit "cs" in hint, however, "what would occur by setting hint to cs" should be clarified.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">I can confirm after talking with a developer here that Word will write hint=”cs” and that it appears only to be used when Word writes list formatting in HTML output. So, hopefully we can agree to keep the attribute
value and we are all correct that it has no effect on the giant table added to 17.3.2.26 rFonts by this DR. Assuming there are no other concerns, we should take a little time to tweak the text on the cs description (and possibly reflect the same in eastAsia)
to sound less directive since the actions implementers are to take are defined well in the table added to 17.3.2.26.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">Thanks for the analysis, Suzuki-san!<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">John<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;border-color:rgb(225,225,225) currentColor currentColor;padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> John Haug [<a href="mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com" target="_blank">mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 9, 2015 4:06 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'SC 34 WG4' <<a href="mailto:e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org" target="_blank">e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: COR3 issue: ST_Hint<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">We discussed this on the last teleconference. Nobody remembered the details behind this and some old e-mail dug up by Murata-san and Caroline didn’t show a specific decision or reason. Chris and I looked through
a trove of public files we have access to and “cs” does appear in some. I think the right resolution here is to keep “cs”.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">John<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;border-color:rgb(225,225,225) currentColor currentColor;padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> John Haug [<a href="mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com" target="_blank">mailto:johnhaug@exchange.microsoft.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, August 14, 2015 2:52 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'SC 34 WG4' <<a href="mailto:e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org" target="_blank">e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> COR3 issue: ST_Hint<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Background: E-mail “Leftover from DR 09-0040” (latest reply 2015-08-03)<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Summary:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">ST_Hint (DR 09-0040)<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;font-size:7pt">
</span>DR removed “cs” value<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;font-size:7pt">
</span>--> Murata-san to remove "cs" from schemas<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;font-size:7pt">
</span>** Only the value “default” remains; where did “eastAsia” get removed? DR 09-0040 adds lots of text referring to “cs” and “eastAsia” values of the hint attribute for some CTs, which is of type ST_Hint. DR 09-0040 is therefore internally inconsistent
and should not be applied as is. I haven’t yet rediscovered why ST_Hint had items removed.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(47,85,151)">Rex> I just checked MM’s mail, “Leftover from DR 09-0040” of 2015-08-02, and his proposed schema fix only removes cs; eastAsia is still there.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(47,85,151)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(47,85,151)">However, on close inspection, the way the Enumeration Value table is written in the COR (see entry #81) is that this is the complete table. As eastAsian was never intended to be removed, I should have shown an
empty row after the default row, containing …, indicating that the remainder of the table stays as is. And even though the COR didn’t contain that …, when I applied the COR to 2012, I did NOT remove eastAsian, ‘cos there was no delete (strike-through in red)
instruction in the COR to do so.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(47,85,151)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:rgb(47,85,151)">Regarding, “DR 09-0040 adds lots of text referring to “cs” and “eastAsia” values of the hint attribute for some CTs, which is of type ST_Hint. DR 09-0040 is therefore internally inconsistent and should not be
applied as is”, I see there is a cs element APART from the cs enumeration value in ST_Hint. (I also see that eastAsia is also an attribute name as well as an enum value.)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I think this needs to be looked at to determine whether the cs attribute value should be removed and to confirm whether eastAsia was to be removed (and if so whether it ought to). Because there is such a significant amount of text changed
here, I think publishing as is would be a problem and that we should correct this before the Beijing meeting so the new DCOR ballot (COR3b?) will have it.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><br>Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake<br><br>Makoto</div>
</div>