<div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b>DR <span class="">11</span>-<span class="">0030</span></b> - OPC:  Obsolete version of W3C XML Digital Signature 1.0<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><a href="https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2011/DR-11-0030.docx?cid=c8ba0861dc5e4adc&sc=documents" target="_blank">https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2011/DR-<span class="">11</span>-<span class="">0030</span>.docx?cid=c8ba0861dc5e4adc&sc=documents</a><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">This DR requests a change in the normative reference of Part 2 §3 from XMLDSig 1.0 (<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/" target="_blank">http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/</a>) to XMLDSig 1.1 (<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core1/" target="_blank">http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core1/</a>).</p><div><br></div><div>We are committed to the introduction of XAdES EN into </div><div>the OPC revision.  XAdES EN uses XML DSig 1.1 </div><div>rather than 1.0.  I thus believe that we cannot stick </div><div>to DSig 1.0.</div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_signature">Regards,<br>Makoto</div>
</div>