<div dir="ltr">Unfortunately, the draft after the Kyoto meeting is lost. I created a new <div>rewrite.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Makoto</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-06-19 20:42 GMT+09:00 Chris Rae <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Chris.Rae@microsoft.com" target="_blank">Chris.Rae@microsoft.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">One piece of information I think is lost in my current draft is the records for which “supported” is “no” but “pass-through on editing” is set to “yes” (this
includes the one DR 10-0048 was originally directed at). I’m wondering whether we could introduce a setting of “Ignored”, meaning that the record is permitted to exist in an OPC file but an OPC consumer must not use its content. It would then be down to implementations
to determine whether to round-trip the record or not.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Chris<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> Francis Cave [mailto:<a href="mailto:francis@franciscave.com" target="_blank">francis@franciscave.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:11<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org" target="_blank">e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: DR 10-0048 (OPC Annex C) proposed changes<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">In the Table Key at the top of C.3 the term “Optional” is defined, but is not used in any of the tables. I think this relates to Chris’ comment
as to whether ‘Yes’ always means ‘may’ or perhaps sometimes means ‘must’.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Francis<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">
<a href="mailto:eb2mmrt@gmail.com" target="_blank">eb2mmrt@gmail.com</a> [<a href="mailto:eb2mmrt@gmail.com" target="_blank">mailto:eb2mmrt@gmail.com</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>MURATA Makoto<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 19 June 2014 02:26<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org" target="_blank">e-SC34-WG4@ecma-international.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: DR 10-0048 (OPC Annex C) proposed changes<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">I love this rewrite. Thanks!<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Regards,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Makoto<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">2014-06-19 7:22 GMT+09:00 Chris Rae <<a href="mailto:Chris.Rae@microsoft.com" target="_blank">Chris.Rae@microsoft.com</a>>:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Attached is a first draft of my proposed rewording of OPC's Annex C. I've tried to cut it down so that the annex refers only to the file format and not to implementations, and as a result have removed quite a lot of normative
text that I believe was relevant only to the MS Office implementation. More work is definitely needed (I've added questions as comments in several places) but hopefully we can use this as a draft to continue work from.<br>
<span style="color:#888888"><br>
<span>Chris</span></span><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
<br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">-- <br>
<br>
Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake<br>
<br>
Makoto <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><br>Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake<br><br>Makoto</div>
</div>