Comment on 1.6 of 26300

Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamilton at acm.org
Sun Jul 21 04:53:43 CEST 2013


Processor is used in other parts of the ODF 1.0/1.1 specifications.  It is not formally defined, however.  Processing is used (i.e., document processing, white-space processing, etc.)  That might be the preferable term, as Patrick suggests.

Before you ask that the passage be deleted, it would be useful to review what it replaced.  It refers to a condition on "element content" that is an XML notion, but that is not determined when there is no DTD.  Since RNG is used for the schema, there needs to be some other means of determining when such white space can always be ignored.  I appeal to your wisdom concerning RNG to determine what is an equivalent provision.


 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: sc34wg6-bounces at vse.cz [mailto:sc34wg6-bounces at vse.cz] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 07:01 PM
To: SC 34/WG 6 mailing list
Subject: Re: Comment on 1.6 of 26300

Another reviewer pointed out that "ODF" appears only in
this subclause.  "OpenDocument format"

Regards,
Makoto
_______________________________________________
sc34wg6 mailing list
sc34wg6 at vse.cz
http://mailman.vse.cz/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg6



More information about the sc34wg6 mailing list