<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>One clarification:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I would further propose that recommendations to the SC 34
Plenary should as far as possible be drafted during the <b>FIRST SESSION</b>,
but that it may be necessary for some email communication to agree final
wordings, which can happen in the hour or so following the close of the first
session. Recommendations may, of course, already have been drafted during the
teleconference meeting on March 17<sup>th</sup>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Francis Cave<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt'>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> sc34wg6-bounces@vse.cz
[mailto:sc34wg6-bounces@vse.cz] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Francis Cave<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 19 February 2010 15:07<br>
<b>To:</b> sc34wg6@vse.cz<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Agenda for WG 6 meeting in Stockholm, 2010-03-25/26<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Dear members of SC 34/WG 6<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>We do not yet have a clear agenda for the WG 6 meeting in
Stockholm. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I propose the following as a place-holder. We will discuss
this on the teleconference meeting on March 17<sup>th</sup>, and can agree any
changes then. However, as I wish to provide an agenda for Kimura-san to
circulate during next week, please respond with any suggested alterations by
Wednesday February 24<sup>th</sup>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>MEETING OF SC 34/WG 6 IN STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN, 2010-03-25/26<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Meeting sessions: <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:36.0pt'>2010-03-25 14:00 – 17:00 CET /
13:00 – 16:00 UTC / 09:00 – 12:00 EDT <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:36.0pt'>2010-03-26 09:00 – 13:00 CET /
08:00 – 12:00 UTC / 04:00 – 08:00 EDT<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:36.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Venue: Microsoft AB, Akalla, Stockholm<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Teleconference facilities are being provided for remote
participation. Dial-in instructions will be circulated nearer the time.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>AGENDA<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>1. Roll-call of participants<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>2. Adoption of agenda<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>3. Review of meeting notes of teleconference meeting,
2010-03-17<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>4. Actions arising and unfinished business from the teleconference
meeting, 2010-03-17<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>5. OASIS ODF TC liaison report<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>6. Project Editor’s report (matters not already covered in
the ODF TC liaison report)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>7. Amendment proposals (if any)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>8. Technical discussion arising from Defect Report
submissions and other agreed actions<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>9. Review of recommendations to the SC 34 Plenary<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>10. Future meetings<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>11. Any other business<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>12. Acclamations<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I would propose that items 1-7 be taken, if possible, during
the Thursday afternoon session, for the convenience of remote participants in
North or South America. Any requirement for technical discussion that arises
from any of these items, and which does not need to be concluded before the SC
34 Plenary, should be scheduled for the Friday morning session. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I would further propose that recommendations to the SC 34
Plenary should as far as possible be drafted during the meeting, but that it
may be necessary for some email communication to agree final wordings, which
can happen in the hour or so following the close of the first session.
Recommendations may, of course, already have been drafted during the
teleconference meeting on March 17<sup>th</sup>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>May I remind those participating remotely that, while I am
making arrangements for teleconferencing facilities to be available during the
WG 6 meeting, you should contact Kimura-san if you wish to arrange remote
participation in the SC 34 Plenary on the Friday afternoon.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Francis Cave<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Convenor <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>