<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=us-ascii" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Rob, Gerry<br>
<br>
Sorry, I am obviously guilty of having over-interpreted (or should it
be over-interpolated?) the direction of the discussion. I'm happy to
correct the draft minutes as Rob has suggested.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Francis Cave<br>
Convenor<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com">robert_weir@us.ibm.com</a> wrote:
<blockquote
cite="midOF38A3F620.B3A6C5C4-ON852578C6.000290B7-852578C6.00065CF7@lotus.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sc34wg6-bounces@vse.cz">sc34wg6-bounces@vse.cz</a> wrote on 07/06/2011 06:37:45 PM:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tuesday 05 Jul 2011 21:46:09 Francis Cave wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I attach draft minutes of the teleconference meeting on 2011-06-22.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Please
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">advise me of any errors.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Regarding Item 6.1:
"Although no formal position was taken by the meeting, the balance
of view during the meeting seemed to be in favour of retaining 26300
to align with ODF 1.1, which will remain a supported OASIS standard
after ODF 1.2 has been published, and creating a new numbered
standard to align with ODF 1.2"
While I understand the reasoning behind the view that perhaps ODF 1.
2 should have a new numbered standard may I present a non-technical
reason for suggestind that IS 26300 should be retained?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I'd also question whether that was the sense of the meeting. My sense was
it was quite undecided and even slightly tipped the other way. But this
is extremely hard to determine on a teleconference, absent a formal poll
of attendees, so I'd be satisfied if the minutes merely stated that the
topic was discussed but no formal position was taken.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Suprisingly thought it may seem, it is not clear that
administrations (more specifically UKG) would be able to get their
heads around the new number. UKG struggles with standards generally.
I caution against anythin that could lead to the unintended
consequence of (even) slower adoption of ODF.
This is not an unevidenced assertion.
May I ask you to look at the following?
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.opensourceconsortium.org/content/view/156/89/">http://www.opensourceconsortium.org/content/view/156/89/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.opensourceconsortium.org/content/view/141/89/">http://www.opensourceconsortium.org/content/view/141/89/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.opensourceconsortium.org/content/view/149/89/">http://www.opensourceconsortium.org/content/view/149/89/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmpubadm/">http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmpubadm/</a>
writev/goodgovit/it63.htm
Thank you
Gerry Gavigan
_______________________________________________
sc34wg6 mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sc34wg6@vse.cz">sc34wg6@vse.cz</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.vse.cz/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg6">http://mailman.vse.cz/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg6</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
sc34wg6 mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sc34wg6@vse.cz">sc34wg6@vse.cz</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.vse.cz/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg6">http://mailman.vse.cz/mailman/listinfo/sc34wg6</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>