Statistics about OOXML defect reports
Shawn Villaron
shawnv at microsoft.com
Tue Apr 28 08:10:51 CEST 2009
I'd certainly say that we're making solid progress here, especially when I consider where we're likely to be at the end of the week. I think this is great.
Regarding the periodic publishing of these, publishing them monthly might make for better progress indicating; two weeks might not provide us enough time to make a dent in the list.
But, regardless of the period, I think publishing information like this is very helpful in showing how productive we've been in improving IS29500 ...
Thanks for sharing.
shawn
-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 11:01 PM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Statistics about OOXML defect reports
Dear colleagues,
Attached please find some statistics about OOXML defect reports.
I am wondering if we should publish statistics every two week.
Regards,
SC34/WG4 Convenor
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list