CZ-0001

[Jirka Kosek]

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:

> I now think that 
> 
> attribute ( r | ref ) { sml_ST_CellRef } 
> 
> is  better than 
> 
> (attribute r { sml_ST_CellRef } | 
>   attribute ref { sml_ST_CellRef })
> 
> because it captures the intention more precisely.  Jirka, do you agree?

Yes I agree, I have already seen change in assembla changeset. I
completely forgot about possibility of using choice pattern for name of
attribute.

Thanks,

			Jirka				

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka at kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20091210/22775dd3/attachment.pgp>