COR-1, AMD-1 and us

[Francis Cave]

Excellent point, Mohamed. We definitely need to avoid dependencies between COR1 and AMD1 for precisely the reason you state. Naturally we are doing all we possibly can to ensure that there is the maximum likelihood of approval of both, but this outcome cannot be guaranteed.

Francis Cave


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Innovimax SARL [mailto:innovimax at gmail.com]
> Sent: 06 July 2009 18:59
> To: SC 34 WG4
> Subject: COR-1, AMD-1 and us
> 
> Dear,
> 
> Just trying to answer more in detail to Gareth (sorry I called you
> Horton)
> 
> We will publish 2 documents COR-1, AMD-1
> 
> They both can be rejected, so we cannot act like what is in one
> preexist to the other
> 
> They are independant and we may end up with strange scenario (like
> AMD-1 accepted, but COR-1 rejected)
> 
> That's why I want to be sure that we make consistent choice about what
> to put in each in order to have consistent scenario in all the cases
> 
> Mohamed
> 
> --
> Innovimax SARL
> Consulting, Training & XML Development
> 9, impasse des Orteaux
> 75020 Paris
> Tel : +33 9 52 475787
> Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
> http://www.innovimax.fr
> RCS Paris 488.018.631
> SARL au capital de 10.000 €