A new editorial DR, 09-0276, and proposed solution

[Shawn Villaron]

Seems like a valuable improvement to the readability of the standard.  Also doesn't seem error-prone or otherwise risky and you have the final text.  I have no objections to incorporating it into COR1 for Parts 1 and 4.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:17 AM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: A new editorial DR, 09-0276, and proposed solution

As I was working on the schemas for the COR1 and AMD1 set, I noticed an oversight in Parts 1 and 4. It is not stated as to which files in the accompanying zips correspond to which schema subclause in the annexes.
Although one can deduce this mapping, it makes sense to state it explicitly..

Although the change is large in terms of page count, the pattern used for each change is trivial.

It would be nice to get these corrections into the first CORs for Parts 1 and 4.

Rex