SC 24 Standards in ODF Format

[Shawn Villaron]

We've identified a few problems with the content part as currently defined ( e.g., if my memory serves me correctly, there is not facility to define a transform for the content part ).  Time is pretty tight, but we might be able to fix those for COR1/AMD1.  

If we had a content part which works, I think that modifying the note would be a good first step.  To go any further, I believe, would require considerable investigation to ensure we do the right form of integration.  

-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:22 AM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Re: SC 24 Standards in ODF Format

> 
> Do you know if the ask goes more than what our content part allows?  
> The content part was designed to provide implementers the ability to 
> introduce new ML, like X3D, into conforming applications.

15.2.4 (Content Part) has a note for example contents.  If we add model/x3d+xml to this note, do you think that we are done?

Cheers,
Makoto