DR-09-0034 (was "Re: DR-09-0032 and DR-09-0034")

[MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)]

> I wrote:
> > By the way, 
> > when the pack URI scheme is used to reference to files within OOXML 
> > zip files, will our media types be returned?
> 
> Having read Part 2, I guess URIs using the pack scheme are required to
> return the content type as specified in [Content_Types].xml.  
> Since this is not clearly specified in Annex B of Part 2, we should 
> probably introduce "B.5 Media types" and explicitly state this
> requirement.  (I will submit yet another defect report.)

I find that the pack URI scheme registered at IANA is based on an 
Internet Draft <draft-shur-pack-uri-scheme-05.txt>, available at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shur-pack-uri-scheme-05.txt

This document is brand new but is still based on Ecma-376 (1st edition). 
In particular, non-ASCII logical part names are not allowed.

Moreover, this I-D does not say anything about what is a package, what 
happens when a non-package MIME entity is located, and what is returned.

Q1:  If a non-zip file is returned, what will happen?

Q2:  If a non-OPC zip file is returned, what will happen?

Q3:  Does this pack scheme apply to both Ecma OOXML OPC packages (1st
     edition) and 29500 OPC packages?

Q4:  What happens when non-ASCII part names are used?  In other words, 
     what will happen when the pack scheme is used for IRIs?

Q5:  Will the returned MIME header contain media types as specified 
     in [Content_Types].xml?

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT at asahi-net.or.jp>