DR 09-0210: WML: Custom XML and Smart Tags

[Rick Jelliffe]

Shawn Villaron wrote:
>
> *Nature of the Defect:*
>
> The first bullet on pp. 529 has, "It is intended to be used to specify 
> a family of smart tags to which this one belongs."
>
> The standard should not attempt to explain the purpose of XML 
> Namespaces in normative text.
>
> *Here is the proposed response for this DR:*
>
> The exact changes are as follows:
>
> _[/Guidance/: _It is intended to be used to specify a family of smart 
> tags to which this one belongs._ /end guidance/]_
>
> I’ve like to suggest that we move this to LAST CALL.
>
> shawn
>
Perhaps use conformance language for clarity.

"This attribute?/element? may/should specify a family of smart tags to 
which this one belongs."

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe