Action item from today's WG4 phone call

[Rex Jaeschke]

Some NBs did not submit their comments in the required ISO comment form. In
those cases, the project editor did his best to identify the individual
comments in those submissions, and produced versions in the required ISO
comment form.

Part 1
*	CA used an IEC form, which appears to be equivalent to the ISO
comment form.
*	FR and JP submitted their comments in narrative form.
Part 2
*	CA used an IEC form, which appears to be equivalent to the ISO
comment form.
*	FR submitted its comments in narrative form.
Part 3
*	CA used an IEC form, which appears to be equivalent to the ISO
comment form.
*	FR submitted its comments in narrative form.
Part 4
*	CA used an IEC form, which appears to be equivalent to the ISO
comment form.
*	CH, FR, JP, and MY submitted their comments in narrative form.
Action: All WG4 members to check that the editor's conversion of these
comments was correct and complete.


Rex

----------------
Rex Jaeschke      www.ProgrammingClassroom.com  www.RexJaeschke.com   Skype:
RexJaeschke
2051 Swans Neck Way, Reston, VA, 20191-4023, USA
Phone: +1 703 860-0091


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20091112/24c68002/attachment.htm>