Proposed Response to the comments suggesting that some DCOR1 set entries should have been in the FPDAM1 set

[MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)]

Dear colleagues,

I spoke with Kimura-san about this issue.  Kimura-san also believes that 
technical corrigenda are, by definition, will have impacts on applications. 
She suggested that relevant text in the Directives should be quoted in
the disposition so that the submitters understand the reason better.

I think that the definition in 15.4.1 and some text in 15.4.2.2 should 
be quoted.

I like the rewrite suggested by Alex.

Cheers,
Makoto
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15.4.1 Definitions 
...

technical defect 
A technical error or ambiguity in an IS inadvertently introduced either 
in drafting or in printing which could lead to 
incorrect or unsafe application of the IS. 


15.4.2.2  A technical corrigendum is issued to correct a technical
defect.  Technical corrigenda are not normally issued for the correction
of a few editorial defects by themselves.  In such cases, correction of
these defects can be incorporated in future technical corrigenda. 
Technical corrigenda are not issued for technical additions which shall
follow the amendment procedure in 15.5. 


Regards,

SC34/WG4 Convenor
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)