JP-0003 for the Part1 DCOR1
rjelliffe at allette.com.au
rjelliffe at allette.com.au
Fri Nov 27 17:10:33 CET 2009
> rjelliffe at allette.com.au wrote:
>
>> My recollection is that the ID duplication problem was really due to
>> circular includes. Removing the circular includes will mean the same
>> attribute on the same element is not defined twice.
>
> But resolving circular dependencies would cause more radical cut into
> schemas. So might be it is just safer to remove IDs now as they don't
> serve any purposes and refactor schemas later when we will have more
> time for testing (I know very naive assumption ;-).
I don't expect so. I was certainly expecting that all circular includes
would have been removed already post-BRM.
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list