Agenda for Paris Meeting

[Jesper Lund Stocholm]

Hi Shawn,

 

I agree with you that comment disposition (am I the only one who had
hoped I'd never hear that term again?) is the most important issue we
will likely face in Paris.

 

Apart from that, I have no objections to your revised agenda.

 

Jesper Lund Stocholm
ciber Danmark A/S

From: Shawn Villaron [mailto:shawnv at microsoft.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:21 PM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Agenda for Paris Meeting

 

Hi everyone,

 

I was just reviewing the proposed agenda for the Paris meeting so that I
can ensure I allocate resources here properly to that I'm prepared for
the topics.  I noticed the agenda is currently listed as follows based
on ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1294 rev.1:

 

Draft agenda

1.      Opening - 2009-12-01 09:00 

2.      Roll Call of Delegates 

3.      Adoption of the Agenda 

4.      Approval of the Minutes of the Last Teleconference 

o    Review of action items

5.      Defect Reports 

6.      The Relationship between "Transitional" and "Strict" 

7.      Environments for Maintaining Schemas 

8.      Public Relations 

9.      Comment Disposition for the DCOR ballots (N1247,N1248, N1249,
and N1252) 

10.  Planning for Future Projects 

o    Technical differences between ECMA-376: 2006 and ISO/IEC 29500:
2008 (SC34 N1202 and SC34 N1234 ) 

o    Attribute unqualification 

o    ISO dates 

o    CORs and AMs for the rest of the defect reports 

o    Amendments .vs. Revisions 

11.  Any other business 

12.  Closing - 2009-12-03 17:00 

I'm wondering if this agenda is truly in order of the priority of our
work.  For example, after reviewing my notes from our last face to face
meeting in Seattle, that we'd prioritize things this way:

 

Proposed Draft agenda

1.      Opening - 2009-12-01 09:00 

2.      Roll Call of Delegates 

3.      Adoption of the Agenda 

4.      Approval of the Minutes of the Last Teleconference 

o    Review of action items

5.      Comment Disposition for the DCOR ballots (N1247,N1248, N1249,
and N1252) 

6.      ISO 8601 Dates

7.      Attribute Unqualification

8.      The Relationship between "Transitional" and "Strict" 

9.      Defect Reports 

10.  Environments for Maintaining Schemas 

11.  Public Relations 

12.  Planning for Future Projects 

o    Technical differences between ECMA-376: 2006 and ISO/IEC 29500:
2008 (SC34 N1202 and SC34 N1234 ) 

o    CORs and AMs for the rest of the defect reports 

o    Amendments .vs. Revisions 

13.  Any other business 

14.  Closing - 2009-12-03 17:00 

In short, I believe that our Comment Disposition is the most important
activity we have; this is followed in importance with the work that the
UK is leading regarding ISO 8601 dates and the Czech issue related to
attribute unqualification.  

 

Perhaps we could chat about this in our next phone call?

 

Thanks,

 

shawn

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20091023/6b0e48aa/attachment.htm>