My action item: Letter to the W3C Web Applications WG
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp
Sat Oct 31 23:25:12 CET 2009
> So are you suggesting that we compare and contrast OPC/Widget terminology
> and make suggestions to the Web App WG to change theirs to avoid any
> potential confusion associated with common terms with different
> definitions?
I am afraid that I have not made myself clear.
Having seen the widget package spec and OPC, I do not believe that any
changes to the terminology or concepts in widget are necessary. I
am just saying that we shouldn't ask them to study OPC and change their
terminology or concepts.
Will somebody write a detailed comparison paper and become a project
editor for a comparison annex or profile? If not, what can WG4 achive?
Will we just cause trobules to the Web App WG?
Cheers,
Makoto
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list