My comments on DR 10-0001
Horton, Gareth
Gareth_Horton at datawatch.com
Thu Apr 8 14:21:04 CEST 2010
Murata-san,
If we were to implement my proposals on the 8601 profiling, this would be the case anyway. I did not make any exception for this invalid date within the allowed value space.
Gareth
-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
Sent: 08 April 2010 13:10
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: My comments on DR 10-0001
Jesper,
It appears to me that Chris is concerned about not changing
the semantics of formulas (e.g., "1900-02-28" + 2 = "1900-03-01")
and that you are concerned about disallowing "1900-02-29" as
an ISO8601 cell value.
Can we make both of you happy? For example, is it possible
to keep the dateCompatibility attribute while explicitly
disallowing "1900-02-29" as an ISO8601 cell value?
Cheers,
Makoto
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list