DR 10-0001 - removal of leap year bug from strict (was RE: Detailed agenda for the 2010-04-22 teleconf)

[Chris Rae]

Okay, this turned out to be a lot more involved than I expected. Changes are in the attached word document and PDF. A couple of points:

* I left references to the "1904 backwards-compatibility date base" the same (i.e. I did not remove "backwards-compatibility"). The work done at the BRM appeared to be steering consumers away from both the leap-year bug and the 1904 date base, so I didn't want to undo that.
* I am not 100% sure I've changed the schemas in the right way. I'd appreciate a second pair of eyes.
* Unlike any other transitional features, this requires not just a change in schema and normative schema element descriptions - it also involves a large change some pieces of prose (sections that talk in general terms about dates). I wondered about referring to ECMA-376 here but Murata-san preferred the idea of just pasting the prose into Part 4, so I've done that. This prose will change when we integrate the ISO 8601 profiling - we will have to remember to update these in the right order (it should be apparent at the time as the section will have moved to another Part).

Your thoughts much appreciated,

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com] 
Sent: 23 April 2010 13:12
To: Jesper Lund Stocholm; MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given); SC 34 WG4
Subject: RE: Detailed agenda for the 2010-04-22 teleconf 

I dropped the ball on this - will do it in the next few days so we'll be fine to put it on the agenda for the next meeting.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Jesper Lund Stocholm [mailto:jesper.stocholm at ciber.dk]
Sent: 21 April 2010 01:10
To: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given); SC 34 WG4
Subject: RE: Detailed agenda for the 2010-04-22 teleconf 

Hello Murata-san,

I see that "DR 10-0001,  SML: Removal of dateCompatibility attribute" is on the agenda for tomorrow. As the minutes from last TC tell we decided to remove the attribute for strict documents. But we have not yet received a write-up from Chris, so I think it would be premature to deal with this again at the TC tomorrow (which I am not able to attend, btw).

I propose we postpone this DR until we have some concrete wording to look at.


Jesper Lund Stocholm
ciber Danmark A/S

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
> Sent: 21. april 2010 06:54
> To: SC 34 WG4
> Subject: Detailed agenda for the 2010-04-22 teleconf
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> The agenda has been published as SC34 N1417, but this detailed agenda 
> shows which DR to be discussed.
> 
>    1. Opening of the Meeting (14:00GMT)
>    2. Roll Call of Participants
>    3. Adoption of the Agenda
>    4. Approval of the Draft Minutes
>    5. Defect reports
>           * Custom XML DRs (DR 09-0207, DR 09-0208, DR 09-0210,
>                DR 09-0211, and DR 09-0213)
>                   Custom XML on 4/8 WG4 Meeting on 2010-03-29
>                   Custom XML Defect Reports Batch on 2010-03-24
>           * DR 09-0012, Parts, Font Part: Incomplete definition for 
> Font Part
>           * DR-09-0030,  OPC: Placement of package 
> RelationshipReference
>                                    elements
>           * DR 09-0157,  WML restriction on ordering of run properties
>           * DR-09-0165,  SML and PML: Lack of Media Types
>           * DR 09-0168,  OPC: No mechanism to distinguish
ECMA-376:2006
>                                    from IS 29500
>           * DR-09-0216, WML: Custom XML and Smart Tags
>           * DR 10-0001,  SML: Removal of dateCompatibility attribute
>    7. Any Other Business
>           * Removing 8601 dates from Transitional
>           * Tentative COR/AMD assignments
>                   See Shawn's proposal, Proposal for Corrigenda vs.
>                   Amendment Bucketing for Stockholm Defect Reports, on
>                   2010-03-22
>    8. Adjournment (16:00GMT)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> SC34/WG4 Convenor
> MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: all changes for dr 10-0001.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 842210 bytes
Desc: all changes for dr 10-0001.pdf
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100427/00129e1d/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: all changes for dr 10-0001.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 36361 bytes
Desc: all changes for dr 10-0001.docx
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100427/00129e1d/attachment-0001.bin>