DR 09-0061 Shared MLs, Shared Simple Types: Constrain ST_Panose value set

[Chris Rae]

Hi all - I did a bit of investigation into this and it looks like almost all valid values are actually excluded by the current regexp. The regexp is:

\s*[\s0]?2\s*[\s0]?[0-9A-Fa-f]\s*[\s0]?[0-9ABab]\s*[\s0]?[0-9]\s*[\s0]?[0-9]\s*[\s0]?[0-9Aa]\s*0?[0-9ABab]\s*[\s0]?[0-9A-Fa-f]\s*[\s0]?[0-9A-Da-d]\s*[\s0]?[0-7]\s*

Some example values that are rejected:

1
5
50

Murata-san, will this be enough to go back to Suzuki-san with?

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com] 
Sent: 30 July 2010 11:42
To: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given); e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: RE: DR 09-0061 Shared MLs, Shared Simple Types: Constrain ST_Panose value set

Thanks very much, I'll look into that.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp] 
Sent: 29 July 2010 06:12
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: DR 09-0061 Shared MLs, Shared Simple Types: Constrain ST_Panose value set

Long time ago, Shawn said that the current regexp rejects some legal values.  Suzuki-san requested an example.  Since then, nothing has happened.

Cheers,
Makoto