DR 09-0322 - OPC: Types

Shawn Villaron shawnv at microsoft.com
Tue Jan 5 19:26:32 CET 2010

Here is our proposal for addressing this DR.

Agree that there's benefit in additional defined terms.  Update §4 Terms and Definitions to include the following term in place:

relationship type - A URI.  Identifies the function of a relationship within the package, as defined in the Standard.  Format designers may define new relationship types as needed.

However, we suspect that more important here is that the use of the word "type" be clarified in place in specific instances of use the document, that simple extensions to definitions may not be the best way to clarify the confusion.  If there is agreement that is necessary and valuable, we would like to consider such an enhancement to the usability of the document.
See attached for additional context for this response.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100105/8f2d7324/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DR 09-0322.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 288691 bytes
Desc: DR 09-0322.pdf
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100105/8f2d7324/attachment-0001.pdf>

More information about the sc34wg4 mailing list