Another error in the Part 1 FPDAM1

[Jesper Lund Stocholm]

Hi all,

As I recall, we did not change namespaces /within/ OPC. (not simply
'related')


Jesper Lund Stocholm
ciber Danmark A/S


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Villaron [mailto:shawnv at microsoft.com]
> Sent: 18. januar 2010 15:06
> To: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given); SC 34 WG4
> Subject: RE: Another error in the Part 1 FPDAM1
> 
> I don't believe the intention was to change these namespaces.  That
is,
> anything OPC-related, I believe, was to be left as-is.
> 
> Am I missing something here, or did I misunderstand the intended
> change?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> shawn
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 6:04 AM
> To: SC 34 WG4
> Subject: Re: Another error in the Part 1 FPDAM1
> 
> > http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships
> > in page 3955 of the original Part 1 is not replaced by a new
> namespace
> > name.
> 
> The same thing applies to
> http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/relationships
> in page 3964.
> 
> Cheers,
> Makoto