Proposed Response to FPDAM Part 1 BR-0001, et al

Shawn Villaron shawnv at
Sat Jan 23 17:27:47 CET 2010

I’m fine with the rewrite.  I was hoping to make a more definitive statement given all of the discussions we’ve had, but if folks want to take this approach, I’m fine.

From: Innovimax SARL [mailto:innovimax at]
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 5:12 AM
To: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
Cc: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Re: Proposed Response to FPDAM Part 1 BR-0001, et al

+1 for this rewrite

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:33 PM, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <eb2m-mrt at<mailto:eb2m-mrt at>> wrote:
> WG4 does not believe we need a new versioning technology
Let me propose a rewrite of this sentence.

       WG4 is not sure whether we need another versioning technology.


Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the sc34wg4 mailing list