Proposed Response to FPDAM Part 1 BR-0001, et al
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp
Mon Jan 25 18:56:55 CET 2010
> I think Shawn had it just right. I agree with him that this is exactly the right time to
>make a strong/definitive statement. We have spent so much time on this
>issue and made no change whatsoever.
I do not think that we have spent a lot of time on versioning. We spent
a few hours in Denmark, and that's all. A few hours are not at all good
enough for this difficult topic.
>I am not aware of any member
>feeling so much in doubt that they are actively working on proposals to
>identify unhandled cases that need new mechanisms.
Had I not cared existing documents conformant to both the 1st edition
Ecma OOXML and ISO/IEC 29500:2007, I would have proposed a mechanism
for distinguishing the 1st edition OOXML and ISO/IEC 29500:2007.
Moreover, when the next version of Parts 1 and 4 introduce significantly
inconsistent changes, I may well propose a versioning attribute.
More information about the sc34wg4