Problem with a decision made on last week's WG4 telcon

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) eb2m-mrt at
Wed Jan 27 00:28:40 CET 2010

You wrote:
> This fixes errors in examples, which are non-normative. 

But the second half of this issue is:

> The FPDAM1 for Part 1 should replace the (incorrect) namespaces 
> by
> and 

You wrote:

> As such, it does NOT
> meet the criteria for being in an amendment. 
> As such, I have NOT included
> this in the amendment. Instead, it should be submitted as a DR for the next
> COR.

We have used an amendment for namespace name changes.  Should we 
wait for another amendment?


More information about the sc34wg4 mailing list