AMD2: Draft, FDAM, FPDAM?

[MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)]

> With regard to Switzerland, being mirror committee chairman, I'd be
> able to ensure that informal early circulation of a draft followed by
> consideration of whatever comments we make would be equally effective
> as a formal PDAM ballot. For example I could circulate the current
> draft (or a later version that I would need to have by July 29 at the
> latest) to the Swiss mirror committee and have us agree on a set of
> comments which I would take with me to the Tokio face-to-face meeting.
> (Would that be a good idea? Could I expect agenda time to be available
> for discussion of such comments? 

Yes, I plan to put this topic in the agenda for the Tokyo meeting.

> Or would this kind of approach be
> seen as somehow unfair to other P-members of SC34 if the "land of
> watches" (which happens to care a lot about matters of timezones, days
> that have 23 or 25 hours instead of the usual 24, etc.) gets an extra
> opportunity to make comments and have them considered?)

I don't think that that kind of apparch is unfair to other P-members 
of SC34, but they certainly have the right to disapprove what we develop.
Let's discuss in Tokyo.

Cheers,
Makoto