Draft for review: ISO 8601 date work on IS 29500

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp
Tue Jul 27 17:28:09 CEST 2010

> Are there any consequences to how the specification is put together if
> we take this route? The current scope we are talking about is an
> amendment. Does this also apply here?

I now feel that  sentences such as "The rsult shall be the same 
as if 8601 dates are converted to serial dates and then ....". are good
enough (a tiny reference model approach)..


More information about the sc34wg4 mailing list