Draft for review: ISO 8601 date work on IS 29500

[Chris Rae]

My apologies - it's the child element, yes. You're correct in your assumption regarding @t.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp] 
Sent: 22 July 2010 16:27
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: Draft for review: ISO 8601 date work on IS 29500

Chris,

> Hello Murata-san: I am not talking about @v in CT_String - I'm talking 
>about @v in CT_Cell (which is of type ST_Xstring, which is a restriction of xsd:string).

If I'm not mistaken, CT_Cell does not have an attribute named "v".  It has a child element named "v".  

Probably, @t in CT_Cell specifies a type name and a child element <v> contains a cell value.  Is this correct?

Cheers,
Makoto